A UCLA graduate brazenly admitted using ChatGPT for his final projects during his graduation ceremony. This shocking confession, captured in a viral video, has ignited a firestorm of debate about academic integrity and the erosion of traditional education values. The incident, occurring in June 2025, underscores a troubling trend where technology undermines hard work and honesty. However, is it dishonest? If answers can be obtained by seeking certain ways, what are we really testing students on? Is it about cognitive ability without AI, or something else entirely?
The Bold Admission
The graduate, amidst cheers, proudly displayed his laptop with ChatGPT responses, signaling a flagrant disregard for academic standards. This act, celebrated by some peers, highlights a deeper issue: the normalization of cheating through AI. Studies, like one from ScienceDirect in November 2023, show AI’s negative impact on academic integrity, yet this graduate’s confidence suggests a cultural shift towards expediency over ethics. But is it cheating, or thinking smarter, not harder, especially when billions are poured into AI development, like Project Stargate’s $500 billion investment announced in January 2025? The line between innovation and dishonesty blurs as technology advances.
Consequences and Controversy
Calls for degree revocation have flooded social media, reflecting a conservative backlash against perceived moral decay in education. The Office for Students’ new free speech rules, effective this year, demand robust responses to such breaches. However, UCLA’s silence on this matter raises questions about institutional accountability. The potential for fines and expulsion, as seen in similar cases, looms large, yet the graduate’s audacity suggests a lack of fear of repercussions. If AI is the future, as tech giants like OpenAI and Oracle push forward, are we punishing students for adapting to it, or failing to adapt our educational systems? How do teachers test cognitive learning of subjects if students use AI as a plagiarizing method not a tool?
A Call to Action
Educators and policymakers must confront this challenge head-on. The temptation to cut corners, exacerbated by exhaustion and technological ease, must be met with stringent measures. The conservative perspective demands a return to traditional values, where degrees signify genuine achievement, not technological shortcuts. This event at UCLA serves as a stark reminder of what is at stake. However, as billions are spent on AI, like Project Stargate, is it time to rethink what “cheating” means? Are we testing cognitive ability without AI, or the ability to leverage it effectively?
Should universities prioritize technological innovation over academic integrity, or is it time to reclaim the value of hard work and honesty in education, even as AI reshapes the world?
Like this article?
☕️ Please buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/criordan
👉 Follow me on X: @CRiordan2024
Click HERE to read more from Clara Dorrian.
