Marjorie Taylor Greene’s explosive bill announcement demands a citizenship-only census to reshape House seats, sparking fierce debate. Could this redefine American liberty by prioritizing citizens over immigrants? Dive in to uncover the stakes.
Why Citizenship Matters Now
The U.S. Census counts everyone—citizens, green card holders, and illegal immigrants—for House seat apportionment. Greene’s bill, announced June 30, 2025 and not yet introduced to congress, seeks to count only citizens, aligning representation with voting power. Supported by President Trump and conservative lawmakers like Chuck Edwards, it aims to curb the influence of non-citizens in Congress and the Electoral College. With Tom Homan leading Trump’s deportation push, the bill fuels a broader movement to prioritize American sovereignty.
The Case for a Citizen-Only Census
Proponents argue that counting non-citizens distorts democracy. States like California gain extra seats due to large immigrant populations, diluting the votes of citizens in low-immigration states. A 2019 study estimated non-citizens shift 26 House seats, favoring high-immigration areas. Greene’s bill will mandate an immediate census, forcing redistricting based solely on citizenship. This could strip up to 27 seats from Democrat strongholds, restoring balance to Republican-leaning states.
Citizenship Empowers American Liberty
By focusing on citizenship, the bill ensures House seats reflect those with a legal stake in America’s future. For example, citizens in Ohio or Alabama, who lost seats due to immigrant counts, would regain fair representation. Moreover, it discourages sanctuary policies that attract illegal immigrants for political gain, as seen in New York’s redistricting tactics. Consequently, the bill strengthens electoral integrity, aligning representation with the principle of “one citizen, one vote.”
Citizenship Undermines Election Fraud
By focusing on citizenship, the bill exposes vulnerabilities in current election systems. For instance, Kamala Harris won states like California and New York, which lack voter ID requirements, raising concerns about undetected illegal immigrant votes. Trust in elections worsens each cycle as more non-citizens potentially slip through, diluting citizen voices. Therefore, a citizen-only census could strengthen electoral integrity, ensuring House seats reflect legal voters and not fraudulent influence.
Challenges and Opposition
Critics, including Democrats, argue the bill violates the 14th Amendment, which mandates counting “the whole number of persons” for apportionment. They claim it could undercount communities, harming federal funding and census accuracy. Legal battles loom, as past attempts to exclude non-citizens failed. Nevertheless, supporters like Senator Bill Hagerty insist that citizenship-based counts protect American voters from diluted influence.
The Bigger Picture for America
If passed, Greene’s bill could transform Congress by prioritizing citizens, reinforcing the value of legal residency. It complements Trump’s deportation agenda, signaling that America rewards citizenship, not border violations. States with fewer non-citizens, like Montana or Wisconsin, would gain seats, amplifying rural voices. Additionally, it could reshape Electoral College dynamics, impacting future presidential races. Thus, the bill champions a citizen-first vision of governance.
What sacrifices are Americans willing to make to ensure their votes aren’t overshadowed by non-citizens?
Like this article?
☕️ Please buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/criordan
👉 Follow me on X: @CRiordan2024
Click HERE to read more from Clara Dorrian.
