Gabbard’s Nuclear Threat Alert Sparks Global Fear
On June 10, 2025, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard dropped a bombshell on X, warning that humanity teeters “closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before.” Speaking from Hiroshima’s scarred grounds, she painted a grim picture: modern nukes could wipe out millions instantly and starve billions via nuclear winter. Blaming “warmongers” for pushing nuclear powers toward conflict, her viral video, complete with a chilling simulation of a San Francisco blast, gripped viewers, and she called on the people to rise up and oppose it. Yet, just days later, Israel’s airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear sites raised eyebrows. Was Gabbard’s plea a coded message to “we the people?” The clash over Iran’s nuclear program demands answers.
Israel’s Bold Strike Fuels Suspicion
Only three days after Gabbard’s warning, Israel launched airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities, claiming Tehran was “weeks” from a bomb. Prime Minister Netanyahu, backed by Mossad, insisted Iran had enriched uranium to near-weapons-grade, and they were fast-tracking delivery systems. But in an interview with Bret Baier, BiBi admitted the Iranians were a year away from success. The strikes, which hit sites like Natanz, seem more like a power play than a necessity. Meanwhile, the timing—smack in the middle of U.S.-Iran talks—hints at sabotage.
Gabbard’s Stand Clashes with Israel’s Claims
In March 2025, Gabbard told the Senate Intelligence Committee the U.S. sees no evidence Iran is building a nuke.
“Supreme Leader Khamenei hasn’t restarted the program halted in 2003,”
she stated, citing the Intelligence Community’s 2025 assessment. The IAEA agrees, finding no “credible signs” of an active weapons program. Her candor, rooted in a soldier’s disdain for war lies, contrasts sharply with Mossad’s vague claims, eerily reminiscent of Iraq’s WMD fiasco.
Strikes Backfire, Risks Soar
Israel’s strikes, far from crippling Iran’s program, delayed it by mere weeks, per the IAEA. Iran hit back with drones and Israel quickly enlisted the US Navy for help in shooting them down. Gabbard’s Hiroshima visit, where she saw the scars of nuclear devastation, drove her warning’s urgency.
Gabbard’s Truth vs. Intelligence Games
Gabbard’s video and testimony carry weight because she’s no establishment pawn. A veteran who ditched the Democrats over their warlust, she knows the intelligence community’s dirty tricks. Her call to “speak up” challenges a system that thrives on fear. Israel’s narrative, propped up by Mossad’s murky claims, feels like a script to keep Iran as the eternal villain, justifying endless conflict. As tensions climb, her warning begs a question: Are we sleepwalking into catastrophe because of another intelligence lie?
Summary and a Lingering Question
Gabbard’s dire warning and Israel’s strikes expose a rift over Iran’s nuclear threat. While Israel claims Tehran is on the verge of a bomb, Gabbard and the U.S. intelligence community see no active program, a view the IAEA supports. Israel’s shaky evidence and convenient timing raise doubts, echoing past intelligence failures. As Iran retaliates and talks collapse, the world edges closer to chaos. Gabbard’s plea for truth stands against a backdrop of fear-driven agendas.
So, what’s driving this clash—genuine danger or a manufactured crisis to fuel endless war? And what could DNI Gabbard possibly mean when she calls on the people to step up and intervene?
Follow the author on X: KM Broussard
My articles on patriotnewswire.com
